🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are watching closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of nations are moving toward comparable bans.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that smartphones and networks are "taking away our children's childhood". The policy may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have stated that an similar ban remains "an options under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to approve a law lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a related action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is given. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the step does not enact binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a good first step," stated one MEP supporting the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in strong research".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. Nonetheless, the government vowed to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. One foundation founded by the relatives of a girl who died after being exposed to dangerous social media material argues that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are safe and suitable for children," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, action is largely unfolding at the local government level amid federal stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has signed a law banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule limiting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with additional access dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws requiring guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various individuals to follow this lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from these regions, further states are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, global agencies take a more nuanced position. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The body highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve safety.

While this global debate unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and others show that states around the world are less and less prepared to delay for the industry to self-regulate.